Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52021
Return-Path: <tyra3l@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 86608 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2011 07:23:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 27 Apr 2011 07:23:54 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.42 mail-ew0-f42.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.42] ([209.85.215.42:45174] helo=mail-ew0-f42.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id A5/00-20725-784C7BD4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 03:23:52 -0400
Received: by ewy2 with SMTP id 2so436944ewy.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:23:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=Tkf+kz/D+7Nr3RnOiENeMA4a9X/2aChsUU5dXwJLwwQ=;
        b=d4tUOY17YKiGs/US71O9C0KM+czknhL6+q6NpHyBO0R5hk5qmsOJgSYicf7feJbsOF
         7++06A21NQv8Hkz2r0RbQEl/01e8hmr8U/1XzNlaPXvvb86JzFp1x0Te6VAi1FI2KrsC
         zts6jo0Rl2dh/yCCemMr0pSrMDt4jZjJpyHO4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        b=h1IOfZN5OLwzVV4+2meUsKqGlZ/rNvFloQSsdfJOSSA+Zynk0VdRsptHAbeJDtGrPC
         50c/tf4rGYsNi/QvtiK5oPhDyKSJYTtQLETt0+b0X6EuAMv5BTND5rIa+xQgH+eBhBJ+
         h2YLNCJAStMSyl/nYB8+6rbPAYX8y73EEsGck=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.148.67 with SMTP id u43mr793000eej.7.1303889029128; Wed, 27
 Apr 2011 00:23:49 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com
Received: by 10.14.127.79 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:23:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimDdM4Udx53qW8jU4NuP3kU8+vmU6y4ZgXRVn+X@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimDdM4Udx53qW8jU4NuP3kU8+vmU6y4ZgXRVn+X@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:23:49 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: vYW184N4KC744wYktaEufqHONg0
Message-ID: <BANLkTinMW_iqqOPJCuLnCB+-VEKxapPdGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Felipe Pena <felipensp@gmail.com>
Cc: internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51a7af868610a04a1e152e9
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Return type-hint
From: info@tyrael.hu (Ferenc Kovacs)

--bcaec51a7af868610a04a1e152e9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Felipe Pena <felipensp@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> I've updated the patch and the RFC that proposes the return type-hint
> implementation (Engine + Reflection).
> The proposed implementation is working just like the last changes in the
> parameter type-hint (in trunk). i.e. working with the "scalar" and
> "numeric"
> pseudo-types.
>
> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/returntypehint
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Felipe Pena
>

for the upcoming 5.4 release, I think it would be extremely useful, even
without the scalar stuff.

Tyrael

--bcaec51a7af868610a04a1e152e9--