Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52005
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain thelounge.net designates 91.118.73.15 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4DB54D0F.7010601@thelounge.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:29:35 +0200
Organization: the lounge interactive design
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110421 Fedora/3.1.9-2.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <5870D50E38AE4374833F83A59ABFB59E@gmail.com>	<4DB4847B.3080004@gmail.com>	<20110424202353.GC21102@crousti> <BANLkTi=kG_6KiEzNwmdAFtQqLnS=jCkoKw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=kG_6KiEzNwmdAFtQqLnS=jCkoKw@mail.gmail.com>
OpenPGP: id=7F780279;
	url=http://arrakis.thelounge.net/gpg/h.reindl_thelounge.net.pub.txt
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enigF73408F82A157ACAF79FA3F4"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Call non-static method staticly raise E_STRICT, but
 why call a static method instancely won't
From: h.reindl@thelounge.net (Reindl Harald)

--------------enigF73408F82A157ACAF79FA3F4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



Am 25.04.2011 09:52, schrieb Alessandro Nadalin:
>> Nothing wrong with it.
>>
>> The E_STRICT is raised because when you call a non-static method
>> statically, $this will not be defined and that could be a problem (e.g=
=2E
>> the method could rely on it). When you call a static method with ->, i=
t
>> remains a static call, $this will not be defined anyway, and there is
>> absolutely no problem with it.
>=20
> I can see your point, but I think we should drop this "feature" not to
> let developers have N ways of doing the same things:=20

why should ANYTHING be dropped affection backward compatibility?

> if you declare a method as static, you should be able to only call it=20
> with a static call, not hrough an object.

that is a opinion, but not enough to damage BC

> PHP usually lets you do the same thing in a few ways, and that's a bit
> frustrating

there are so naby different woman and cars out there and that's a
bit frustrating - you know what i mean?

> because we should force some kind of best practices for
> the language: not .advise, but *force*

maybe you are using the wrong language if this is your opinion?
nobody says "stop selling guns because somebody can shoot in his foot"


--------------enigF73408F82A157ACAF79FA3F4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk21TQ8ACgkQhmBjz394AnkV9gCfX/XpjOmpsnt7xJJncAR4MWkK
4IsAni0Czt9ux6qXR27PilLLq1fKgwer
=7mMD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigF73408F82A157ACAF79FA3F4--