Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52001 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 2315 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2011 14:43:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Apr 2011 14:43:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.42 mail-ew0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.42] ([209.85.215.42:63775] helo=mail-ew0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 35/54-49249-21734BD4 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 10:43:31 -0400 Received: by ewy2 with SMTP id 2so505195ewy.29 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 07:43:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZAWRhm1au7qfoQ+mhXSzEB1/T94pG+Ro9ayAJ6riMsU=; b=hPtszGkQtEl7hwcBEeWjhgaX4FPtvR/kzvQTGzSlfIS7y8aKcNEocJTV3CiwOItTwg DBiTzJBObY4F/aa+a6J3mThm0XKjkScapKURRrRpUP3KQWdep4llwD7lho9zM5ULGZJN DUzPImr66IPLYsXhgOM1rA3wUV4ppY+lAmCfk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=eFvMyZhLey6o/BiTAiVHrprRNEBDxt5Ifi5Q59n21KBQPxtvMhdCSba6WtQPXuMMDj VmaIam9nDwAV/jUNX56Y5cleF71RAP3JtD5XNEAO09tX2HcvGf3alzo+7bKtQNWeXxV6 P0GaK3Hb0sBN6NXYTKLphSjAy3o4gprFGU6og= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.50.196 with SMTP id z44mr1040124eeb.227.1303656207583; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 07:43:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.45.3 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 07:43:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DB41D25.3040505@lerdorf.com> References: <4DB20A65.1030504@schlueters.de> <4DB41D25.3040505@lerdorf.com> Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:43:27 +0200 Message-ID: To: Rasmus Lerdorf Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?= , PHP internals list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) 2011/4/24 Rasmus Lerdorf : > On 4/24/11 4:41 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: >> >> hi, >> >> Do we really need apache 1.x SAPIs? >> >> ISAPI should be kept in (was decided so by the 5.3.0 release time), it >> is still used and works for users with custom versions. A new version >> may come as well, as part of one of some features I'm working on. > > Your argument for ISAPI applies exactly to Apache 1 as well. Not that it is so important (does not hurt anyone to keep it in) but apache 1.x is dead, not IIS :). Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org