Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:51999
Return-Path: <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 75525 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2011 08:41:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 24 Apr 2011 08:41:05 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.42 mail-ew0-f42.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.42] ([209.85.215.42:53314] helo=mail-ew0-f42.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 43/32-49249-022E3BD4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 04:41:04 -0400
Received: by ewy2 with SMTP id 2so468918ewy.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 01:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=mKUjSRRmHceUwktUEzowna5Pl3XZd17z/a7/SvFo3tI=;
        b=uufG4CFEKml2bJS0L8nOnrTuPQmJlfbKcAHz4kQONsMQto2bLNlB7xqgHwGKZcZJ7N
         WwY/br2e+0eXJh9yyQ/DSRm+Z9/BpDgODBBTxUtJ7YHpQ52AUzLhAOqAfmE5o/6xLEos
         Nf1EhAwdsW+GsvI8NMvLi3X3VSUR4/aCYRZ1I=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=edOnFkgjYw1bsV6zMgVGq12sVvHPFwtXliVH2jNOH2C08vF9LfPpSrAjXDuBHKRfX/
         J7YYQfSbpJUFBFMz73wIjUkuIgP/AFk7UeVJuuxN1BxWiZDxk//pE1D0DEgQIyABSYE2
         6zNtx4e6N9hkaNHvXoYNIzaPFp80ITeuc63eg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.126.3 with SMTP id a3mr892485eei.203.1303634460054; Sun, 24
 Apr 2011 01:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.53.74 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 01:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DB20A65.1030504@schlueters.de>
References: <4DB20A65.1030504@schlueters.de>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 10:41:00 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTimXujfyO+Mah1kjKYMV_ShdQMhONw@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?= <johannes@schlueters.de>
Cc: PHP internals list <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

hi,

Do we really need apache 1.x SAPIs?

ISAPI should be kept in (was decided so by the 5.3.0 release time), it
is still used and works for users with custom versions. A new version
may come as well, as part of one of some features I'm working on.

2011/4/23 Johannes Schl=FCter <johannes@schlueters.de>:
> Hi,
>
> we have quite a few SAPIs where I expect that nobody looked at them for
> years. Anybody objects from dropping them from trunk? This brings less st=
uff
> to document and less confusion for users.
>
> I suggest dropping:
>
> aolserver
> caudium
> continuity
> milter
> phttpd
> pi3web
> roxen
> thttpd
> tux
> webjames
>
> I'm not sure about:
>
> apache_hooks
> apache2filter
> isapi (is FastCGI now preferred on Win?)
>
> That leaves:
>
> apache
> apache2handler
> cgi
> cli
> embed
> fpm
> litespeed
> nsapi
>
> johannes
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>



--=20
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org