Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:51905 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 64408 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2011 16:09:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Apr 2011 16:09:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=olemarkus@olemarkus.org; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=olemarkus@olemarkus.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain olemarkus.org from 213.236.166.183 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: olemarkus@olemarkus.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.236.166.183 unknown Received: from [213.236.166.183] ([213.236.166.183:38988] helo=remus.fluks.no) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5A/50-59898-C2C17AD4 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:09:17 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by remus.fluks.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4405D50336C; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:09:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fluks.no Received: from remus.fluks.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (remus.fluks.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ox6iRnfLZcgl; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:09:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (7.233.16.62.customer.cdi.no [62.16.233.7]) by remus.fluks.no (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 897E3503427; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:09:11 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: internals@lists.php.net, "Hannes Landeholm" References: <4D9E96B6.6060401@lerdorf.com> <718216446.20110408143441@cypressintegrated.com> <4DA0E71C.9030008@gmail.com> <4DA63ED8.4080402@yahoo.com.au> <4DA6F2BC.10706@yahoo.com.au> <4DA6FB03.9040404@yahoo.com.au> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:08:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.00 (Linux) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Implicit isset/isempty check on short-ternary operator From: olemarkus@olemarkus.org ("Ole Markus With") On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:05:45 +0200, Hannes Landeholm wrote: > So basically the discussion now is what exact characters that should be > used > to represent this operator? I really hope we can get this implemented > quickly... I worked with $_POST yesterday and I could really use that ?? > operator. > When it comes to $_POST you probably want to use filter_input instead. Cheers, Ole Markus With