Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:51804 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 8668 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2011 11:41:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Apr 2011 11:41:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=Pascal.Courtois@nouvo.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=Pascal.Courtois@nouvo.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain nouvo.com designates 91.121.162.155 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: Pascal.Courtois@nouvo.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 91.121.162.155 sociatom2.sociatom.com Received: from [91.121.162.155] ([91.121.162.155:52303] helo=ks360347.kimsufi.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 59/D4-52504-DEC589D4 for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2011 07:41:33 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ks360347.kimsufi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC625008D for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 13:41:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at sociatom.com Received: from ks360347.kimsufi.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ks360347.kimsufi.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rWE19Hr2ox+f for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 13:41:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.205] (lns-bzn-47f-62-147-131-15.adsl.proxad.net [62.147.131.15]) by ks360347.kimsufi.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 13:41:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4D985CDF.2080201@nouvo.com> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 13:41:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <1301828287.2187.1.camel@tomas-ubuntu> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] patch review From: Pascal.Courtois@nouvo.com (Pascal COURTOIS) Le 03/04/2011 13:30, Peter Beverloo a écrit : > The parsing change you are proposing is invalid per RFC 1738. RFC 1738 has been obsoleted by RFC 3986 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986