Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:51740
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=aXEG9sp7NxGgBtm4pn7GbvXBViWf/wXvpoKKAOwHruJj5dbs6/y1hRtqm4q2d3ik8Y
         kkHxFZ3FvuwOFpL2jIdgLHlsyLeb/dtegzBIOTkOa5txUFigVSnpuecAsEEAoTUU+klO
         VFlkceZOUCyiqqZaLBLoIyJ2zpqi+6wwlDohk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimAbRX4rWCLbdGAp-bg-wSZ+3JfaOtP2u3VomGq@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTin95R1-XC0Bz51X4MNEqUB-7oiwcSFY48Og1bB-@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=MTtoPeNp5Vip+_ODHGB3EDg3on1wiaitoyfbG@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimAbRX4rWCLbdGAp-bg-wSZ+3JfaOtP2u3VomGq@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:05:01 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTinnNDuBbvZOO1aOSC9ne7dw6W=kJA0LY=LXaY4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott MacVicar <scott@macvicar.net>
Cc: =?UTF-8?B?T25kxZllaiBTdXLDvQ==?= <ondrej@sury.org>, 
	internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] embedded libmagic (from file)
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

why don't you publish it then? So we can review it and maybe apply it alrea=
dy.

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Scott MacVicar <scott@macvicar.net> wrote:
> I have a diff sitting that I did yesterday that upgrades us to the
> latest libmagic, it supports the new magic file format and updates
> that bundle. But that's all.
>
> I'm also against allowing the non-php version. Yes it's a fork but
> unfortunately it's for the best.
>
> - Scott
>
> On 21 March 2011 10:12, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> Many incompatibilities and features are not available upstream. The
>> more we work on it the more differences we have. I have to strongly
>> (really strongly) discourage any kind of hacks to allow external
>> libmagic usage. That will only limit the features available to the PHP
>> users, like stream support for example.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Ond=C5=99ej Sur=C3=BD <ondrej@sury.org>=
 wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> [I have searched the list and no relevant answer came up, only one
>>> unanswered question (*)]
>>>
>>> I would like to ask whether there is a strong reason to have
>>> customized libmagic in the source tree as the only option. I saw the
>>> discussion that you want to have embedded magic database, but still I
>>> would like to have an option to use system libmagic if available.
>>>
>>> This is similar to libgd, etc.
>>
>> No, it is definitively not the same than libgd. Libgd is now being
>> synced and the core features were the same.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> Pierre
>>
>> @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
>>
>> --
>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>
>>
>



--=20
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org