Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:51595 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41396 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 09:54:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 09:54:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 207.97.245.153 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 207.97.245.153 smtp153.iad.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [207.97.245.153] ([207.97.245.153:40043] helo=smtp153.iad.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 36/64-17187-04BA47D4 for ; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 04:54:08 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp55.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 091472E02AF; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 04:54:06 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp55.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 6573E2E029D; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 04:54:05 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4D74AB3C.8040702@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 01:54:04 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110221 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Joye CC: Gustavo Lopes , "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4D7431C3.10405@sugarcrm.com> <4D74A8FD.3020102@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] file streams & metadata From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > The key part of this reply was "these particular", as they are very > platform specific and useless in a generic stream wrapper > implementation. Every stream wrapper doesn't have to implement them - as it doesn't have to implement conversion to socket, etc. But without this, it is impossible to create a stream wrapper that implements full range of filesystem functions - which means, wrappers are useless for dealing with filesystem. This is a big hole in functionality, and it should be fixed. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227