Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:51210
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain yahoo.com.au from 98.139.53.214 cause and error)
DomainKey-Status: good
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au;
  h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=wvLXSmqfG+6EP4jmslvkA0Ggd7shfZ+inSssQ53qzrjs/NbsyjQRgLWXnjUxqmCRst0ZQmjrpiwaDcZvpKuyiWxjg4kh2m/Oi6f3d57sTZs4PNbHiLNc6GRv8wmuXsQ4jGs1M4lTEW214vpMsVBVvTZxEWOIZzBgvAp9RS5+ln8=  ;
Message-ID: <4D21A1E2.7010909@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 21:16:02 +1100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stefan Marr <php@stefan-marr.de>
CC: internals@lists.php.net
References: <89C52156-CF92-4DDB-8BA4-4ABF6883512C@stefan-marr.de> <4D21415A.10002@gmail.com> <4D21658A.2030208@yahoo.com.au> <A3DD15C5-1618-4310-B79A-66DEF213A53C@stefan-marr.de> <4D219123.2080803@yahoo.com.au> <9F94CB7F-AEC1-4E54-B4E5-29C3E55DCACA@stefan-marr.de> <4D219866.1020606@yahoo.com.au> <1E24A44B-6B6C-486E-BA31-8C14AB557D45@stefan-marr.de>
In-Reply-To: <1E24A44B-6B6C-486E-BA31-8C14AB557D45@stefan-marr.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Traits and Properties
From: mail_ben_schmidt@yahoo.com.au (Ben Schmidt)

On 3/01/11 8:57 PM, Stefan Marr wrote:
> Hi Ben:
>
> On 03 Jan 2011, at 10:35, Ben Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> OK. So this comment from your email is outdated?:
>
> Yes, outdated since this email:
> http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=129288735205036&w=2
>
> Best regards
> Stefan

OK, Stefan, I just got confused by reading your outdated message that was quoted 
in a recent reply, and by the fact that the "last update" date of 2010-11-18 at 
the top of the RFC is inaccurate, so I assumed the email was more current than it 
was. Seems like the RFC was actually updated circa 2010-12-20. :-)

Sorry for the noise, guys.

Ben.