Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:51061 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 423 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2010 18:27:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Dec 2010 18:27:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.45 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.45 mail-bw0-f45.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.45] ([209.85.214.45:43519] helo=mail-bw0-f45.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 74/50-32261-4F95A0D4 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:27:01 -0500 Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so4219763bwz.32 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:26:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=C8Ed4sv1YLXHNpc5RQreOKkMhttPwTvPJuMN1aWZjSo=; b=AKdLixMXoo0rbZjQLJtov+K+xH328QNGNLcBYkpFjz73BE71o69SmEajKd9x8mi506 JfLBuVI2vKiE9sBoX9zmykvJaw45aSnrQfRnfjF3EFam1+mWEyPQ6B2j/caehocoyPdH PNsY8RZp9STcXtydc83GZTn4z5PLcEZaolaMg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=d+Wrw6OmnuXEQml6lA0SAUz6eMnMetJeF9etDMvD6R+E2pwIKJ5V7wUUaSDcuvUcei YgPq9ohRQ6k9I/PDJvAHWG1Vx/Wj36hWZKz9dPsafTY21CbdRKzZh6NoLuwL0eb9thdG u+HSDsl0x5D391xhIDDi8Kw/Q8wmGbgym74Ac= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.54.147 with SMTP id q19mr7644824bkg.145.1292524017428; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:26:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.52.129 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:26:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <6b2ba5e56d64910c49bb431ba1e36e17@nebm.ist.utl.pt> <59.E3.36789.3D72A0D4@pb1.pair.com> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:26:57 +0100 Message-ID: To: Gustavo Lopes Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Add option to disable POST data processing From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Gustavo Lopes wrote: > In short, I don't think the possibility of a future implementation of more > high level mechanisms should preclude the existence of low level ones such > as the proposed and committed enable_post_data_processing, as the low level > ones, being less specific, have a larger domain of application, despite > being more cumbersome. I do, more than ever before. My reasoning is simple, php is full of such small hacks we have to deal for years, both at the internal level or from an application point of view. Hence too why I'm not sure it is worth the gains. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org