Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50995 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 16500 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2010 17:29:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Dec 2010 17:29:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=quickshiftin@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=quickshiftin@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.45 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: quickshiftin@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.45 mail-bw0-f45.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.45] ([209.85.214.45:39895] helo=mail-bw0-f45.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6B/2A-59644-D63620D4 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:29:18 -0500 Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so4518949bwz.32 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:29:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=yWbwMDHEgNM62byxSt+JjCLfCDFc5fV1KoG+1DMXbzo=; b=leCqCIQODQ4ztHJuF3jRgIUXF7XsCptiQU24fc1+UDchM6ArlRFHzVMhOxJaoJNrlu qhPvd+bNRSgYPmmzzQpL8xYkGSQ8ytlOrbrrvyXvFCerulc+k6AmMto5BbdTUH8f1yyj G/sXZ7B+BNp6XRiSwHzxq7EnKxCCmlp6JPZgI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ieHxhR0usKXXzd3E0BspaKuBBGSdoQDeg+DtxI0o0/vtnY3+t4Ll6pChpWEbxzWH72 ZX8InzyCPNt5aGbhT6Nijb1SaSN464+hs1DJ4Cc4dQHd8jjl2D0XhYBGCbv+GadLkma0 6vxaIMkWT+GpXyMpP8S6vVEI1O3dMtewmfp6k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.61.10 with SMTP id r10mr780216bkh.195.1292002154103; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:29:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.112.208 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:29:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <9CD87200-33CB-40BE-A81C-36FD7471F59C@stefan-marr.de> <9A31F2F9-ED6B-4BE5-A6E2-EB4536E8667F@stefan-marr.de> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:29:14 -0700 Message-ID: To: Martin Wernstahl Cc: Stefan Marr , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5bf4671c464049711b177 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Traits expecting interfaces implicitly leads to expensive runtime checks From: quickshiftin@gmail.com (Nathan Nobbe) --001636c5bf4671c464049711b177 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Martin Wernstahl wrote: > First i have to say that I am not a PHP internals developer, but as a user > I think it would maybe be better to just let the trait use the implements > keyword, and "copy" that to the classes utilizing the trait? > This is actually in the RFC as a rejected proposal http://wiki.php.net/rfc/traits#rejected_features But what I'm talking about is something different. We're not trying to say 'these are the methods implemented in the trait', rather, 'this trait expects a class it is used with to be of a certain type or implement a certain interface' for the trait to do its job. -nathan --001636c5bf4671c464049711b177--