Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50965
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain hristov.com from 85.92.87.36 cause and error)
Message-ID: <4D010C27.7070706@hristov.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 18:04:39 +0100
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>
CC: PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <4D00ABFE.5070403@hristov.com>	<AANLkTi=5gs-_QGJVRmH0o+Cfu-pGYHymEOfRpCDr_wL8@mail.gmail.com>	<4D00CF96.3070701@hristov.com> <4D010093.8090604@thelounge.net>	<4D010193.9030603@hristov.com> <4D010669.8020209@thelounge.net> <4D0108A5.9010702@hristov.com> <4D010A2C.1070702@thelounge.net>
In-Reply-To: <4D010A2C.1070702@thelounge.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Deprecating "global" + $GLOBALS, making $_REQUEST,
 $_GET, $_POST read-only
From: php@hristov.com (Andrey Hristov)

Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 09.12.2010 17:49, schrieb Andrey Hristov:
>> sure, one's thrash is another mans cash.
> 
> Stop this dumb style

I have been paid quite well for fixing other man's thrash because it 
just did not work. "Thus, one's thrash is another man's cash." But do we 
want this a normal job?

> I know very well which script is good anough with
> a simple hack and where i have to do a real
> application style and i do not like braindead
> ideas forcing me to get lost this decision
> 
> There are so many reasons to write explicit "throw-away-code"
> and YOU DO NOT have to decide this for others
> 
> Nobody forces you to use coding you do not like
> So please stop braindead forcing other people

Who told you that I'm forced to write such code?

>> Who taught you that globals mean clean design and 
>> non-reentrancy is cool and works?
> 
> Who thaught you to decide what script from others
> has to be written in which way?
>>> So why in the world would you like to kill them braindead without
>>> any valid reason, and "i do not like something" is not a valid
>>> reason because nobody forces you to use such things in your
>>> scripts
>>>
>> because my writings today are the legacy of tomorrow.
> 
> Your writings today are idiotic "we should break existing code because we can"

You probably got me wrong. The code will be broken and can be fixed. 
It's not like going line by line and checking whether everything will 
work. I'm tired of explaining this.

Andrey