Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50862 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 20091 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2010 20:21:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Dec 2010 20:21:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.163 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.163 smtp163.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.163] ([67.192.241.163:44768] helo=smtp163.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 97/A2-01246-A24FBFC4 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 15:21:00 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 336D227013A; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:20:56 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp6.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id AC84E270135; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:20:55 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4CFBF425.90005@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 12:20:53 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin Eberlei CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4CFBDA09.2020902@sugarcrm.com> <20101205203616.51a66416@benny-pc> In-Reply-To: <20101205203616.51a66416@benny-pc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch: Marking DateTime Instances Immutable From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > i actually implemented this in userland, but its rather ugly: It is ugly because you try to have one class with two semantics. It is a mistake. If you remove this ambiguity it actually would be quite small. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227