Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50800 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 91231 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2010 09:14:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Dec 2010 09:14:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 213.123.26.185 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.123.26.185 c2beaomr07.btconnect.com Received: from [213.123.26.185] ([213.123.26.185:29471] helo=mail.btconnect.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 57/D1-15182-86367FC4 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 04:14:17 -0500 Received: from host81-138-11-136.in-addr.btopenworld.com (EHLO _10.0.0.4_) ([81.138.11.136]) by c2beaomr07.btconnect.com with ESMTP id AYA94150; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:12:13 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4CF762EC.9050207@lsces.co.uk> Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:12:12 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20101013 SUSE/2.0.9-2.1 SeaMonkey/2.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP internals References: <1291216564.27624.43.camel@guybrush> <201012020044.26416.larry@garfieldtech.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Good-1, source=Queried, refid=tid=0001.0A0B0301.4CF762EC.024F, actions=tag X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2beaomr07.btconnect.com X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0206.4CF76365.032C,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] git anyone? From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) dukeofgaming wrote: > Yet another one here:http://hginit.com/00.html > > The title says it all: "Subversion re-education". > It is actualyy a somewhat neutral article even though the page is a > mercurial tutorial. Actually this probably point up one of the fundamental differences between the different ways of working. 'Most people work with Mercurial through the command line' ... fill in your own package ... Personally I very rairly use any of these from the command line, since Eclipse has fully integrated facilities. The statement 'it just works from the cammand line' only applies if that is what you are still using, but even CVS I would have to dig out the manual to use the command line. Productivity wise, having to pull out of the IDE to do code management is the main problem with switching from CVS/SVN to any of the alternatives, but the main thing I can't understand is how people actually MANAGE with command line when dealing with a large number of changes? A graphical facility is almost essential when navigating around complex code trees and viewing diffs which are more than a few dozen lines? ( Pierre this is probably one of the reasons I had so much trouble building PHP on windows ... simply because I have used graphic IDE's since C++ Builder 1 days and before :( Command line working is a somewhat different mind set ... and prior to C++ I was working on hand coded machine code ... ) -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php