Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50790 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 24711 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2010 15:31:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Dec 2010 15:31:38 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([127.0.0.1:5312]) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ECSTREAM id E4/F6-25725-A5A66FC4 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:31:38 -0500 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dsp@experimentalworks.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dsp@experimentalworks.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain experimentalworks.net from 217.114.211.66 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dsp@experimentalworks.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.114.211.66 unknown Solaris 10 (beta) Received: from [217.114.211.66] ([217.114.211.66:42699] helo=config.schlueters.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C0/95-25725-E1766FC4 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:17:51 -0500 Received: from [192.168.23.101] (p5B2DB84D.dip.t-dialin.net [91.45.184.77]) by config.schlueters.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E73EB4B6A8; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:17:47 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CF66715.3080405@experimentalworks.net> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:17:41 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9oYW5uZXMgU2NobMO8dGVy?= CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <4CEE0ADA.5010705@lsces.co.uk> <4CEE1327.7050405@lsces.co.uk> <9A.53.20008.2113EEC4@pb1.pair.com> <1291216564.27624.43.camel@guybrush> In-Reply-To: <1291216564.27624.43.camel@guybrush> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] git anyone? From: dsp@experimentalworks.net (dsp) On 01.12.2010 16:16, Johannes Schlüter wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 10:01 -0500, David Soria Parra wrote: >> On 2010-12-01, Pierre Joye wrote: >>> hi, >>> >>> I think we have enough feedback about this topic. We will come back >>> with a detailed proposal explaining how it could be done, which tools, >>> etc. >> >> I think it would be good to have people willing to help out with evaluating >> certain DVCS. In particular we need someone for BZR to put together a good >> RFC. I'll probably help evaluating Git and Mercurial. >> > > An evaluation requires a clear set of goals first. Like: Why change? > What is broken? What can be improved? What are existing requirements? > Once that is done one can start evaluating specific tools. yes, I'm aware of that, but it make sense to ask for people support right during a discussion. So we can get together and discuss the goals. > > johannes > >