Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50687 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 8453 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2010 11:41:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 11:41:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=felipensp@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=felipensp@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: felipensp@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.42 mail-bw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.42] ([209.85.214.42:41258] helo=mail-bw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 3B/30-06354-D4193FC4 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 06:41:02 -0500 Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so3920741bwz.29 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:40:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=k1ndXrNL1LrYYrI8F3MJGUOseF2LZyIsH4xrxnXuL7E=; b=IwwVBW/I1OAzCDT96RgZdSxiEK2v/+X1NgLP9qPcDK+FTkJh7KOMgOBaBlqZodoJZE 4/iL8ZCMHYYlMPf4laB6jC4mkqro4bK5XBafPW5W86Fg0lXQWbrzX3E4JlAAtxnUuxNP nUPOH58NgLMRzQ+jG8de/7doQ0okSNZt4qdmk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=faG11Tk7zrmKb+JYLs1s7soiRgnSA58FmC6LZb1QPFrLbyAKbL2JIqHOG3TOFcvRXi 38yxlxVoXADnfF1v4iAsWvMdNpnauZlPsP3+bYu7afdlexaKNGzDIAiwNZiG3YZEiP8k QHjBcvlNxlGaDz1F3DYcmJNKPRWIjPsGiFtqs= Received: by 10.204.66.148 with SMTP id n20mr4681385bki.137.1291030858358; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:40:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.52.146 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:40:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CF35BBA.3040006@zend.com> References: <4CF35BBA.3040006@zend.com> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:40:36 -0200 Message-ID: To: Dmitry Stogov Cc: internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5ad92b4e12f04962f8b1e Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] new foo()->bar() From: felipensp@gmail.com (Felipe Pena) --001636c5ad92b4e12f04962f8b1e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Dmitry, 2010/11/29 Dmitry Stogov > Hi Felipe, > I'm wondered it works out of the box with so small patches :) > > However, both patches introduce new parser conflicts and it would be grate > to avoid them. > > I will check if there is any way to avoid it. > Also the patches need to be checked for memory leaks in case of exceptions > thrown from constructor and chained function(s). > Yes, I already did several tests to check this. > It also probably makes sense to add array deference chaining e.g. new > Foo()[] (just for language consistency). > > Hmm, looks good to me. :) Thanks. -- Regards, Felipe Pena --001636c5ad92b4e12f04962f8b1e--