Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50668 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 74639 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2010 17:17:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Nov 2010 17:17:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ssufficool@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ssufficool@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ssufficool@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.42 mail-ew0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.42] ([209.85.215.42:45765] helo=mail-ew0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 70/50-07352-2BE82FC4 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:17:39 -0500 Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so1598826ewy.29 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:17:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ud0Mgj8f1wE774DCnhajlj71WBMTS1u5QNwTm6Vr24o=; b=XWIEgV+GYPUMW/1rVeuGf+AaGBgWrcSvTXRCIyoL7B0eTV6n7q8BGQQnAgIs8nDNTk 4tw2VeKTfTz2lZIPpo59fMClaHFbYYkwKiaWpGbBaU+yvVAGrAtC3YsPpKz0SAH8Aqf1 WWT5uXlp4kVA/gQoRO6e678aKDyC7928RLcYM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=OJ87aAzk+2EZGJByzasv94Xc9MqHY17BA9L6igq9AHjCvWWTP9MctdaGJ6uS5kBRXU xnMezBDWQbdxu7EbKabot1NrAupDPIfkybMOzfss5WyCRYUTXRdHnul9uwUcDkJNXtOI 95aAkNXdhC4z9VLqWgLY1Tt7NV0YGfZ3Tm9Mw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.8.141 with SMTP id h13mr533127ebh.64.1290964655927; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:17:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.22.16 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:17:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1290879624.7033.826.camel@guybrush> <4CF27AAC.9010704@divbyzero.net> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:17:35 -0800 Message-ID: To: Seva Lapsha Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Making T_FUNCTION optional in method declarations From: ssufficool@gmail.com (Stanley Sufficool) Add my name to the list of people who prefer more strict than syntactic sugar. -1