Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50661
Return-Path: <keisial@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 58687 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2010 15:48:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 28 Nov 2010 15:48:41 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=keisial@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=keisial@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: keisial@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.170 mail-wy0-f170.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.82.170] ([74.125.82.170:40056] helo=mail-wy0-f170.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id A5/66-16104-8D972FC4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:48:41 -0500
Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so3672321wyf.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 07:48:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
         :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=4KIF6/upRPqSNkclMJ5hlPIMFyi8c1cfs3+/mblWTwE=;
        b=bybt4lYvHtP99e6rnqn5Cfb/jMVZO9u1wco0TbUWCw34lBSmly9T37dLMh5q+OTE/x
         Ky+xSDq10d3Am/i4trVxEn5bE61Kr/jkItHN2126NCJwJ6eZDm3/q4Sq/gB39z2qgn1h
         iKcmeSeW1BOAxA595vGT9PG8AeTQot/WrJTcM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=YgvUx3zfM3rKhMTs6MQhl4Z/rfrHn9OVHJQoLxOW/kHULtcVX3/C2tlmUo4PtjOo/j
         mvCnGysYz3DBBBFbeINEsWzuJ4zdRHGRiNiODT5J2WegzLj4K9NzP/1KHPwMrHZHw/RX
         0ThAavha+3qxrEhCRgV8UqOUHhuw/Sk3DInTk=
Received: by 10.227.138.6 with SMTP id y6mr4842026wbt.29.1290959317629;
        Sun, 28 Nov 2010 07:48:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.26] (168.Red-83-49-114.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.49.114.168])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f35sm194202wbf.8.2010.11.28.07.48.34
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Sun, 28 Nov 2010 07:48:35 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4CF279F0.80703@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:49:04 +0100
User-Agent: Thunderbird
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>
CC: PHP internals list <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <1290879624.7033.826.camel@guybrush> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1011281511442.4718@kossu.derickrethans.nl>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1011281511442.4718@kossu.derickrethans.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Making T_FUNCTION optional in method declarations
From: keisial@gmail.com ("=?UTF-8?B?w4FuZ2VsIEdvbnrDoWxleg==?=")

Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
>> RFC: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/optional-t-function
>> Patch: http://schlueters.de/~johannes/php/zend_optional_t_function.diff
> I'm -1 on this one. Besides this being confusing for people who want to 
> run "newer" code on older PHP versions; this change does nothing but 
> stop you from having to type "function". Something that the parser tells 
> you immediately that you have forgotten this.
>
> cheers,
> Derick
Join me to the list of people which don't like it.