Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50656 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 46070 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2010 15:04:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Nov 2010 15:04:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ross.masters.rm@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ross.masters.rm@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ross.masters.rm@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.170 mail-wy0-f170.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.170] ([74.125.82.170:41566] helo=mail-wy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F3/E3-16104-48F62FC4 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:04:37 -0500 Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so3646509wyf.29 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 07:04:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Lg01wDiMGbX3sfmYNxUeRxXD617X99P8+mf2SXFKcYo=; b=ruchgRsvl37f/Fuk4/StLQmId03xmchlP8YvAzAwIo8sXFvOEE+8/TcC5QZ9e64Fbp yQ6pI32usCF2zDXkIpxZ4Z5IdCR4VwZ3urnTdMPW4R9xTaSMU1V74NsEUX+gdQi5yubs kMwSKm/zbq/JEPztclDHyAGW2nhsfv4lx/BW8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=mhvek74QpNNFdrbmRx7nN56CQlzhCHoPo5/nPUK/9LmEq9+hvtME9phq5aYBdm0xmC KvrSRDDBfrKFye6Y1P6QmIgzZVfbLXQfBnEe+j9SGl41OdvbhVOySSmDxOQMmBvQ2bO1 ZBCJ7kWCZDfB69AvLk1DSvTcJ6F0MGF4XyZsc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.231.227 with SMTP id l77mr1798568weq.104.1290956673537; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 07:04:33 -0800 (PST) Sender: ross.masters.rm@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.180.147 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 07:04:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1290879624.7033.826.camel@guybrush> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:04:33 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0s06k6YWzS0QtxIt0xNq7L07Ljo Message-ID: To: David Otton Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?= , PHP internals list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cdf1358f2555604961e45e2 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Making T_FUNCTION optional in method declarations From: ross@php.net (Ross Masters) --000e0cdf1358f2555604961e45e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From what I understand T_FUNCTION would be optional, rather than removed altogether, is this the case? This would allow those who want to use it the option of using it and would not break existing code. -- Ross Masters http://rossmasters.com/ 2010/11/28 David Otton > 2010/11/27 Johannes Schl=FCter : > > > Without T_FUNCTION token. In my opinion an access modifier /public, > > private protected, static, final) should still be required for keeping > > readability. > > As a plea on behalf of maintenance coders dealing with large, messy > codebases, please, please don't impact our ability to run 'grep -rs > "function functionName" *', or hit F8, or whatever your IDE's > equivalent is. > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > --000e0cdf1358f2555604961e45e2--