Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50639 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35110 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2010 21:05:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Nov 2010 21:05:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.170 mail-gx0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.170] ([209.85.161.170:37086] helo=mail-gx0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 01/F0-29052-FA271FC4 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:05:52 -0500 Received: by gxk20 with SMTP id 20so1607725gxk.29 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 13:05:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=oBDQ5YIjFlaeYqZRm/9dv/lQ6EpFQh3bHYH+B+dU1DU=; b=gc+2xaN1FBG3X4yVfpW2mch1KVaBm9MsGcz5RTrg7iVfXx3yiGot7UuKYVN7IKuzoJ cMeocAEviPC4QPlH+3bk+SLxVHOOjRUGldhZjloAmCzip3qC6AkgG/lw2Cx3kj9nVDLf dIMONh7yCfEaffNtP1jZQGJMaNDmYzeOfxo6g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=QV+CRl6plbFHqa9rW2d9uxEatmtznQqQyE3VWbpMBxjo7hEO05/kdbYjvMscP2rq7+ pFYLASSnOaClxHiTWOrL6CA/zQtQzsek1Dpec1FA8SqnlVyISECcdAVI3Vswdj+N5V4C NvjG+Q+5a5T2+ghIm02a2wqMbDIWSxJ1TUuMw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.87.8 with SMTP id k8mr6606051agb.6.1290891948176; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 13:05:48 -0800 (PST) Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com Received: by 10.90.53.4 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 13:05:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <61577946-B04E-4218-82A0-5157ADC96102@roshambo.org> References: <1290879624.7033.826.camel@guybrush> <61577946-B04E-4218-82A0-5157ADC96102@roshambo.org> Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:05:48 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: YdsKpI9hjopgsVe15-jzayxtGVg Message-ID: To: Philip Olson Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Johannes_Schl=C3=BCter?= , PHP internals list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ee4a203c7b504960f3424 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Making T_FUNCTION optional in method declarations From: info@tyrael.hu (Ferenc Kovacs) --0016364ee4a203c7b504960f3424 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2010/11/27 Philip Olson > Sorry for moving offtopic, but if the PHP syntax is going to change then we > should revisit other proposals that add/change syntax. For example, I think > the short syntax for arrays was declined [from 5.3] mainly because it > introduced a new syntax at a time we wanted to preserve BC: > > - http://wiki.php.net/rfc/shortsyntaxforarrays > > Regards, > Philip > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > I would love both feature, I think we should finalize the release process/roadmap, and after that, it would be a good idea to revisit the pending/declined rfc-s in the light of the roadmap. Tyrael --0016364ee4a203c7b504960f3424--