Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50631 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 66892 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2010 17:53:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Nov 2010 17:53:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=felipensp@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=felipensp@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: felipensp@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.42 mail-bw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.42] ([209.85.214.42:41363] helo=mail-bw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F6/96-32860-6B541FC4 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:53:59 -0500 Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so2788583bwz.29 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 09:53:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=gYdF0ijpwEN9WDPXHB5CI3YtuMj+BFlJb+ickYqlPyk=; b=mrucvFm/ThnYonb/S0e43zIV9Qea4fVkuTyg02NMRTHsNpwdid1aLjzUN4NbxWeR+r V4w6yq4y4z8G8fZtxQOToS5gpInjSal8djpZsOXWtsWCrGunnrzw17CzBdl5bgLZw4yJ l7NOmjwBWX51gFpl1i+unKu5i8XPgtnEAvw0Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=Wru4zMzqI9MAIFVGE7zG8H+k/QLozXY7lPrZMy+zJ3NQKnREi69/EaMMAGhXutncTq YbhYNqSF6UKYrlZRs+8ugEG6RiLF0Ti+NnQ9eLZKcJA9Y+iXXduZI9FpTJNowZcv0CVX SuXb5+WpPnKMUyOuok3gu/u9XVQq/TkJnrK78= Received: by 10.204.100.66 with SMTP id x2mr3061643bkn.56.1290880434955; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 09:53:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.52.146 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 09:53:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1290879624.7033.826.camel@guybrush> References: <1290879624.7033.826.camel@guybrush> Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:53:34 -0200 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Johannes_Schl=C3=BCter?= Cc: PHP internals list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f7bf4cc5e53204960c85d3 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Making T_FUNCTION optional in method declarations From: felipensp@gmail.com (Felipe Pena) --001485f7bf4cc5e53204960c85d3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/11/27 Johannes Schl=C3=BCter > Without T_FUNCTION token. In my opinion an access modifier /public, > private protected, static, final) should still be required for keeping > readability. > > RFC: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/optional-t-function > Patch: http://schlueters.de/~johannes/php/zend_optional_t_function.diff > > +1 --=20 Regards, Felipe Pena --001485f7bf4cc5e53204960c85d3--