Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50622 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 34693 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2010 16:10:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Nov 2010 16:10:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=hermanradtke@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=hermanradtke@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: hermanradtke@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.42 mail-ew0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.42] ([209.85.215.42:44235] helo=mail-ew0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 85/10-32860-C7D21FC4 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:10:37 -0500 Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so1363380ewy.29 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 08:10:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RKJYXPoUeLSu/MfaX+19jYvXWzxiOQ7A94OOTAZTdvU=; b=ozJMx9X2bKffva52YthhVl6ou42yI487TpyUGr1UaVz9996HfzlcYWNyjLoAVUDRaJ pdxsjW5Job5zVHaZOeoUIsAPE0IGAdHkNURuFvaZEjqFB9RpGI4a3HcfHI5HTKzv32Za BCJJhoQaQKMVCSRR5/NpIqUKKOQIC10ylipnA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hs1uAnMO/iuTN+1utALAJn66F0cSbYekaOd4GIm/SrWt4QkkUu1/aadHB3nB4GelGW qLmUcJLEf7cijhAA76kAy8FLIBJoXvO+H+lBtl7UpOQGIBi5ad8W3H7VY3vR98Cnn5OB 1cte/hdIeGlHkxR7KWRxmQkNL+R/at9KxoaqM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.37.79 with SMTP id x55mr2942715eea.16.1290874231895; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 08:10:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.45.75 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 08:10:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4CEE0ADA.5010705@lsces.co.uk> <4CEE1327.7050405@lsces.co.uk> <9A.53.20008.2113EEC4@pb1.pair.com> Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 08:10:31 -0800 Message-ID: To: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] git anyone? From: hermanradtke@gmail.com (Herman Radtke) The DVCS migration path would not have to be as radical as the path from cvs to svn. A single section of the overall svn repoistory can be migrated to a DVCS. This pilot repo would serve two purposes: determine if that DVCS is the correct choice and allow for a more gradual learning curve. Python is in the process of doing this with Mercurial: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0374/ - PEP 374: On switching to a DVCS http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0385/ - PEP 385: Migrating from svn to Mercurial There was talk of other alternatives to a DVCS too. Those should be considered fully as well. -- Herman Radtke hermanradtke@gmail.com | http://hermanradtke.com