Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50579 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89123 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2010 23:01:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Nov 2010 23:01:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.68 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.68 mail-fx0-f68.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.68] ([209.85.161.68:56798] helo=mail-fx0-f68.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id AA/03-16484-5EAEEEC4 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:01:58 -0500 Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so319817fxm.11 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:01:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=obEbNeL5BKO4Uj3oCmMIb1VfKfc0bdlz09lVeUoe+Ls=; b=U5qo0AKjUDtQXvCQmg+HTepVlvqjdZ/GEnJCJye+Wpbe5Ib1uRHZlMStITYmwNZ3/0 yIV5WJ+kToIQvQ8g+0c1+tt/OOWWJ/cFOadzCN+gWWpfzochBoRZYteJYTk4wnyIoysq ToYJq4nXknCEV1CP8mn5piYxyxAuFx4B6gakA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=p/3gPCqOebTxt5oDp71Xz+EPMneOg7Q/M5NgZLqNFI6IntwRaOJI2nBdJ85BgVWDW8 zpNIv3AQpxXEU6GRYL6UI4whHLvkSCCmTyMjkHbnnjAc8g+iQcKd+GbISv/s8C9/T0sv wDyl8S+dDJ0vw0QhkBTczvr2MbIOxT1UvQO68= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.70.131 with SMTP id d3mr1342726faj.73.1290726114231; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:01:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.83.142 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:01:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <887FE7CFF6F8DE4BB3A9535F53AFD06A2C5D3910@il-ex2.zend.net> References: <73.C4.59959.876BBEC4@pb1.pair.com> <3EA67EA2-A9B1-4DFB-8A30-05B37BCA313B@iki.fi> <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C9154B70@US-EX2.zend.net> <1290705653.7033.73.camel@guybrush> <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C9154C3B@US-EX2.zend.net> <1290707707.7033.115.camel@guybrush> <887FE7CFF6F8DE4BB3A9535F53AFD06A2C5D3910@il-ex2.zend.net> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 00:01:54 +0100 Message-ID: To: Zeev Suraski Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?= , Andi Gutmans , Jani Taskinen , "davey@php.net" , PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Hold off 5.4 From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote: > I think that skipping to a major version is a good idea. It is appealing but not a good idea. I think it is better to get 5.4 with the features we like in it and then consider a major version. There are quite a few things that we could add or changethat would justify a major version (without opening one of our pandora's boxes right now :). As of versioning scheme, yes, a clear and documented one is the way. Anything we can add to the RFC to clarify this would be welcome. Maybe start a new thread, it is getting hard to follow each topic. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org