Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50490 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 27522 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2010 02:59:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Nov 2010 02:59:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=adam@adamharvey.name; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=adam@adamharvey.name; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain adamharvey.name designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: adam@adamharvey.name X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.170 mail-gx0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.170] ([209.85.161.170:59492] helo=mail-gx0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EE/D6-12084-CF0DDEC4 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:59:10 -0500 Received: by gxk20 with SMTP id 20so272545gxk.29 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:59:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.211.15 with SMTP id j15mr149152ang.55.1290653946403; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:59:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: adam@adamharvey.name Received: by 10.100.128.13 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:58:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:58:46 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: SO7OGTUYcConmHwyZFePvrn_2r4 Message-ID: To: Pierre Joye Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] git anyone? From: aharvey@php.net (Adam Harvey) On 25 November 2010 09:47, Pierre Joye wrote: > Please not I'm not requesting to do it now and here, only trying to > get a feeling/poll about git usage. I would be +1 on this, where 1 is the biggest 1 possible without it becoming 2. :) git-svn is a reasonable alternative for smaller repositories and projects (I use it at work on a daily basis to deal with older projects that we haven't migrated to git), but the PHP repository is difficult to use effectively with it, since it (in my experience, at least) requires a checkout of every revision for proper handling of branches and tags. git-svn also imposes some restrictions on developer workflow which aren't insurmountable, but do limit what you can do relative to a real git repository. So, in short, I'd love to see us move to git. Adam