Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50485 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 14361 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2010 01:37:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Nov 2010 01:37:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.42 mail-fx0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.42] ([209.85.161.42:65235] helo=mail-fx0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 00/05-12084-3CDBDEC4 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:37:08 -0500 Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so331999fxm.29 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:37:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=5wiLKlZ7hGJlUvdc3PD0Eb0QqEAW26CqmG/TlWz2ysA=; b=sN23JGwl5mxjK+qYVCsEWPkIDGClx9sC7mFRWnC5xECollIwbK+dQEDCkYaAFO0RW6 jYZqzXBRQMDWDI/2DGnniHRidn4ROM9VKjx2HbHQ55LS82DAw4PY2p4CdZ0OFnKEm/S4 QYCbSNXyDt8yJSbsfC9gUQwi1h/AiJQ6WIh0k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Iei0/Lul93q4Iqu+VsaGkY4kLjINAMQ6M/3lI4T+J0E3+KoB1TfOZsTDBVzH3d5InR LZTNbN3akHKwNIUkOcrupOq7q/RdBtdW5H7bvBiggUPV2tT//vK4zEkozcqdt5YOdajc h0e+3+IZsfWIUS1pRk0BofdYrT9o3uLw+tvug= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.101.140 with SMTP id c12mr104877fao.16.1290649024570; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:37:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.83.142 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:37:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 02:37:04 +0100 Message-ID: To: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: hinting proposals status From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi, To avoid any possible issue or features introduced without consensus, I'd to ask to first revert the current implementation from trunk. There is clearly no consensus on this feature and the RFCs are either incomplete or without actual implementations (http://wiki.php.net/rfc/typechecking). Then every developer involved in one of these proposals is free to create a branch to implement or improve them. I would suggest to use 5.3 as base as it will be show clearly any kind of BC that could be introduced. Once a proposal is considered as ready for testing and voting, then we can actually test its branch and take an informed decision. I will also proudly provide snapshots or builds for any branch at wish, via the http://rmtools.php.net tools, like the onesones available here (windows builds bot only for now, more coming): http://rmtools.php.net/snaps/ By the way, this way of doing things is described in the release process RFC, it is called a feature preview release. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org