Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50461 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 54140 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2010 18:22:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Nov 2010 18:22:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ilia@prohost.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ilia@prohost.org; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain prohost.org designates 209.85.161.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ilia@prohost.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.42 mail-fx0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.42] ([209.85.161.42:47490] helo=mail-fx0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 94/80-49564-D460CEC4 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:22:06 -0500 Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so1059914fxm.29 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:22:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.87.3 with SMTP id u3mr6115632fal.131.1290536522820; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:22:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.126.199 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:22:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <35.94.59959.446BBEC4@pb1.pair.com> References: <35.94.59959.446BBEC4@pb1.pair.com> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:22:02 -0500 Message-ID: To: Michael Wallner Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Hold off 5.4 From: ilia@prohost.org (Ilia Alshanetsky) I too must second Mike's comments about pecl_http not being quite ready for bundling. The extension provides some useful functionality, no doubt (I use it ;-)). But I don't think there is a good case for bundling it. On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Michael Wallner wrote: > On 11/23/2010 10:57 AM, Derick Rethans wrote: >> >> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Felipe Pena wrote: > >>> - pecl/http was planned to be bundled. What's the status? >> >> I'm all for it; but again, it's just copying it over to trunk before we >> branch. > > ... >> >> - copy over APC/pecl_http >> - branch on thursday >> - alpha next week >> - build a list of things that needs doing in 5.4 to get it ready (with >> =A0 possible options to get rid of apc/pecl_http if they are not up to >> =A0 date enough) > > Huh? =A0I'm quite surprised to read that pecl/http is planned to be bundl= ed > with trunk, while--sure--my grand master plan included this option, there= 's > only pecl/http/branches/DEV_2 which is compatible with trunk and I doubt > you all are talking about that version? > > It still needs some serious amount of work, development has stalled again > due to my job's demands. > > Cheers, Mike > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >