Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50453
Return-Path: <derick@php.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 21261 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2010 14:48:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 23 Nov 2010 14:48:30 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6
Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:54730] helo=xdebug.org)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id EC/62-08358-D34DBEC4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:48:29 -0500
Received: from localhost (xdebug.org [127.0.0.1])
	by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AA68DE13E;
	Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:48:26 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:48:26 +0000 (GMT)
X-X-Sender: derick@kossu.derickrethans.nl
To: Matthew Weier O'Phinney <weierophinney@php.net>
cc: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <58.B0.08358.D0DCBEC4@pb1.pair.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1011231446320.24401@kossu.derickrethans.nl>
References: <AANLkTi=ox5uUvEpo8ZuegpTPJLiS353Oqtud1WFGOPUT@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1011231002140.24401@kossu.derickrethans.nl> <AANLkTikpkcXr34ftFiJdpAUQZ2uVn7kkNr+DToB=9Bkq@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1011231359100.24401@kossu.derickrethans.nl>
 <58.B0.08358.D0DCBEC4@pb1.pair.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Release Process
From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans)

On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:

> The status quo works great for those whom it serves. For everyone else,
> it stinks. There's no transparency, which leads to disenfranchisement. 

That's why my first reply said:

I don't mind a yearly release cycle, as we should get out more releases.
I don't mind a monthly release cycle for .z releases.

*that* is a good thing.

regards,
Derick

-- 
http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org
Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php
twitter: @derickr and @xdebug