Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50442 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 3213 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2010 13:58:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Nov 2010 13:58:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:53474] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 44/41-28185-898CBEC4 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 08:58:48 -0500 Received: from localhost (xdebug.org [127.0.0.1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83915DE13E; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:58:43 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:58:43 +0000 (GMT) X-X-Sender: derick@kossu.derickrethans.nl To: Ferenc Kovacs cc: Felipe Pena , internals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323329-1024514259-1290520725=:24401" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Hold off 5.4 From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) --8323329-1024514259-1290520725=:24401 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > > > We also have no plan about what will or will not be 5.4. This looks > > > familiar, this is exactly how we begun 5.3 and it tooks literally > > > years to be released. There is also actually no agreement to begin > > > with 5.4 now. > > > > Yes, but instead of defining "what is PHP 5.4", why not just go with > > what we have? Everything that's not in thre is for PHP-next-next again. > > >=20 > backward compatibility=E2=84=A2 > we had a few nice things in the PHP6 branch, which got merged into the > trunk, before choosing the version number for the trunk. Do you have a list? > > Stalling every time doesn't get us anywhere. IMO we should just go with > > it. >=20 > > I am absolutely against stalling again! > > I am too, but I think that we should carefully cherrypick, what to releas= e > with 5.4 from the current trunk. Cherry pick? Do you have any idea how complicated that is? Derick --8323329-1024514259-1290520725=:24401--