Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50389 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29023 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2010 14:57:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Nov 2010 14:57:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tjerk.meesters@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tjerk.meesters@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tjerk.meesters@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.42 mail-qw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.42] ([209.85.216.42:57820] helo=mail-qw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E9/21-20968-F6096EC4 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:57:51 -0500 Received: by qwd7 with SMTP id 7so130245qwd.29 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 06:57:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=phDXj2NQcaK8mm04sD4B8ZTgHuKYJEUQNIbpN/a+DIg=; b=B2urbO/56g+rqJ4P5se+/2rHtySSUKWcJNljAkTciH5cZY7bzdKkWBEAs7OpFTJw3Q 7Cy7uV+Y+lr6QfejA9wWyVFnySbTWxufMk9QprwHKoOme2BGjpguCN8pDGYaWADLvNka GeOfmWZDCr5vgdze8wtK77BrlLwHF1VSyMR2g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=tbclOOAt+SDoj+t+FtxtT2tyve0pG+qglZ6E+3SVUkDqHj3cMiquKreFbhBfH9JPtr Qi3rx6mVjQkOzBT08aaHVKsuCCp4KUeaRJfbahyuuMQlvHmdpi/Wn7PvIzG5XRdp+9uY IfoFqyYoIDNPkuBswb1p7ZzXN0shGCh7UMFVo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.28.213 with SMTP id n21mr222109qac.64.1290178668956; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 06:57:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.20.14 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 06:57:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.20.14 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 06:57:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4CE5399A.5090304@zend.com> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:57:48 +0800 Message-ID: To: Patrick ALLAERT Cc: Dmitry Stogov , Zeev Suraski , PHP Internals , Rasmus Lerdorf , Derick Rethans Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517503b26428e4e04956921df Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: break/continue $var From: tjerk.meesters@gmail.com (Tjerk Meesters) --001517503b26428e4e04956921df Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Reading those notes I'm wondering what's meant by dynamic break is not working? I understand how it could lead to better compilation, but a mere 'not working' at the very least intrigues me :) I have actually used this construct, though its purpose is mainly in parser routines, so I guess I could always goto instead. On Nov 19, 2010 12:21 AM, "Patrick ALLAERT" wrote: > 2010/11/18 Derick Rethans : >> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Dmitry Stogov wrote: >> >>> Previously we decided to remove "break/continue $var" syntax. >>> I even implemented it in PHP6 brunch, however it wasn't backported into >>> trunk. Could I do it? >> >> Is there a really good reason to remove it? > > Not sure, but at least, it is in *your* release notes :-) > http://www.php.net/~derick/meeting-notes.html#break-var > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > --001517503b26428e4e04956921df--