Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50379 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 79799 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2010 09:31:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Nov 2010 09:31:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@schlueters.de; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@schlueters.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain schlueters.de from 217.114.211.66 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@schlueters.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.114.211.66 unknown Solaris 10 (beta) Received: from [217.114.211.66] ([217.114.211.66:44959] helo=config.schlueters.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9A/B0-07105-BC346EC4 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 04:30:52 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.31] (ppp-93-104-121-88.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.121.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by config.schlueters.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 346B545ECE; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:30:33 +0100 (CET) To: Jani Taskinen Cc: PHP internals list In-Reply-To: <4CE5C399.40200@iki.fi> References: <1290119979.16819.228.camel@guybrush> <4CE5C399.40200@iki.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:30:26 +0100 Message-ID: <1290159026.9702.6.camel@guybrush> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Restructuring NEWS? From: johannes@schlueters.de (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=) On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 02:23 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote: > 19.11.2010 0:39, Johannes Schlüter kirjoitti: > > Hi, > > > > after the 5.3.3 release I was approached with the request to restructure > > the NEWS file -- for instance by grouping entries by extension -- so > > users can identify whether there are bug fixes relevant for them etc. > > Something that I did in trunk NEWS perhaps? I'd like a better formatted > NEWS though. I didn't see that change but yeah something like that. Aybody volunteers to go through the 5.3 NEWS? :-) > And get rid of those ancient Changelog* files as well. :) I proposed this in the past. Some people complained. Nobody fixed it (it is not being updated since the switch to svn, before that only cvs HEAD was updated, no branches...) and I didn't see anybody complaining this tells me nobody really needs them. Using svn history features is more effective anyways ... > Ideas / examples of better format accepted, I can always implement it if > time permits. It would also help if we can forget that 80 chars per line > limit as well. It's 2k already and people do have bigger terminals > nowadays. I like having multiple 80 chars terminals next to each other :-) But I think most editors can wrap or cut it off as one prefers. We should avoid 300 char lines though. johannes