Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50280
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=RXulgtOgeKqwuTfWf7gryjMoZNL7KuW+wZMet9UuUJyRVEMwdtFgYloJLbbdwYZkg9
         1ZgpvXbW6HQAk/W/mELpBvEgjySMpLzxWA7wMqHvPfMYKplN2ff4ypTHvjV5fV7uSPqh
         AzmBfbceRLpkn+eMVRdOxFezciSDM6LusOYUM=
Message-ID: <4CE33F06.3080507@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:33:42 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" <guilhermeblanco@gmail.com>
CC: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>, 
 "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <AANLkTik703Bky+ZtjdzBMY8tr97m34jDSSMyoB9opJKR@mail.gmail.com>	<4CE3340F.6090304@sugarcrm.com>	<87.0F.25421.F4933EC4@pb1.pair.com>	<4CE339DF.1020605@sugarcrm.com>	<AANLkTi=fRYk=GFv5LxDQ0_RTbjpuuwth2GYpbjqRNKfP@mail.gmail.com>	<4CE33D54.8000009@sugarcrm.com> <AANLkTinPw2CKSrC9HW-E4h7P8Lug46wq4HrNYR+8S8AU@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinPw2CKSrC9HW-E4h7P8Lug46wq4HrNYR+8S8AU@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 - Meta attribute (aka. Annotations) supportdiscussion
From: alecgorge@gmail.com (Alec Gorge)

In my opinion (as a person with 0 karma), I think that sounds reasonable 
because most people are most concerned about the actual implementation 
(syntax, performance, apc etc) because I don't think many argue that 
Metadata doesn't have value.

What are the 5 different discussion topics you are thinking of, just out 
of curiosity?

Also, I can just post my syntax idea as a gist or pastie or something 
instead of making an rfc...

-Alec

On 11/16/2010 9:29 PM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Stas,
>
> Ok, so you think I should just consider everyone want some sort of
> meta attribute support and start discussing the topics?
> Should I separate it in different threads or put it all here?
>
> The subject is big and I identify at least 5 different discussions
> that can diverge.
>
> Cheers,
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Stas Malyshev<smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>  wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> I'm able to write 10 RFC's, but none will care until we reach this
>>> list with a patch.
>> Not entirely true. Patch helps, but with feature this big and complex having
>> consensus on design before actually implementing it may be better and save
>> you some time.
>> As for polls, I think generic "having annotations" poll is not very useful.
>> It's like having a poll "should we have cool features in PHP?" Of course we
>> should! The devil is in the details. And so far the details of this thing
>> contain a significant number of devils we have to handle.
>> --
>> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
>> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
>> (408)454-6900 ext. 227
>>
>
>