Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50278 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 1915 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2010 02:26:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Nov 2010 02:26:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.193 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.193 smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.193] ([67.192.241.193:58614] helo=smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 10/21-25421-75D33EC4 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:26:32 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp19.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E806A3C8A13; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:26:28 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp19.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id A240B3C88B1; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:26:28 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4CE33D54.8000009@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:26:28 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" CC: Alec , "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4CE3340F.6090304@sugarcrm.com> <87.0F.25421.F4933EC4@pb1.pair.com> <4CE339DF.1020605@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 - Meta attribute (aka. Annotations) supportdiscussion From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > I'm able to write 10 RFC's, but none will care until we reach this > list with a patch. Not entirely true. Patch helps, but with feature this big and complex having consensus on design before actually implementing it may be better and save you some time. As for polls, I think generic "having annotations" poll is not very useful. It's like having a poll "should we have cool features in PHP?" Of course we should! The devil is in the details. And so far the details of this thing contain a significant number of devils we have to handle. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227