Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50276 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 96240 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2010 02:20:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Nov 2010 02:20:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=guilhermeblanco@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=guilhermeblanco@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.170 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.170 mail-ey0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.170] ([209.85.215.170:34211] helo=mail-ey0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 8F/EF-25421-FEB33EC4 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:20:33 -0500 Received: by eyf5 with SMTP id 5so864398eyf.29 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:20:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZzJWLliWDnUgfBqZi6VfdV5oNTAdKFBq3kjMnWB7I4I=; b=VuQ9wwDJGr1OyOALVWrxQ97wmf0BZ2yzVldg1VIf9T4ILV065LyTO07JKpCz/cF0aF WYiqsPMUO49dGa135ROMfP482E1diCP2fdAELcBAgmGV6sKz+JUlis/6lnj4OF5iv2S4 6CjDMRhll/N3A4jXz5QOwR0K34aB4cC2gBWGc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bdgYv7f0pgWfQoPhpfnchAsi/FAX/ffZ45ivF4g9fzRmAlrG+rb9vBvUguMC13TRD/ vjasJv2S6eWGfUOGdSs3mihYPyvHsHfEl3HX76gEzpCpejZwxt8Naoz338ced6S0xp+G gF5JO3T11Kzd2SrAaeUOowkosAuRYoe0sHDMc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.123.209 with SMTP id q17mr6632012far.126.1289960428598; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:20:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.105.5 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:20:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CE339DF.1020605@sugarcrm.com> References: <4CE3340F.6090304@sugarcrm.com> <87.0F.25421.F4933EC4@pb1.pair.com> <4CE339DF.1020605@sugarcrm.com> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:20:28 -0200 Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: Alec , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 - Meta attribute (aka. Annotations) supportdiscussion From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com ("guilhermeblanco@gmail.com") Hi Stas, A full RFC will be written based on results of polls. I'm able to write 10 RFC's, but none will care until we reach this list with a patch. So instead of lose time, I prefer to discuss what can be done here, write an RFC then finally implement it. But without having feedback from core developers, it's difficult to make any decision. Cheers, On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Stas Malyshev wr= ote: > Hi! > >> I think my reply ( http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.devel/63203 ) >> addresses this. It doesn't introduce any new language constructs per se. >> You could make it even more standard and clear by adding "new" after >> "annotation". > > How about making it a full RFC? It's kind of hard to keep track of things= in > all threads. > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ > (408)454-6900 ext. 227 > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > --=20 Guilherme Blanco Mobile: +55 (16) 9215-8480 MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com S=C3=A3o Paulo - SP/Brazil