Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50266 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 23537 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2010 19:33:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Nov 2010 19:33:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pmjones88@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pmjones88@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.170 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pmjones88@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.170 mail-gy0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.170] ([209.85.160.170:47206] helo=mail-gy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 8E/85-25421-58CD2EC4 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:33:26 -0500 Received: by gyg10 with SMTP id 10so666249gyg.29 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:33:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=Ss8sKMYgemdrSuRhfMHMjLV2E+DO7A5fRR0r97oRI1w=; b=aCpYSSqIHBUPmq395rqLDRrduuR49uufB1b/qW/joa8WYiKQbc3uatHGUFHiN1M6f8 XV67lyyA/g5P68K6UndL1gQDlexjjuKqfquXeULoy89Hg9DTGSagk8Q4PyI3Rxw/ZrPT zqMevMcgrup5Fp1ZIxKIXd2yN0gbRZffkvi6s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=uQQZZ0AKNFXucSgzhIYiZxo89MhqqBmcsDk1vaCyUEFgHh2clGrqzotCx5tjTNWSN7 mQ7D2eLOjycBVODQSekEDP+2PFFloFHxcVYszUvfMTO0+155RDsWWL7ToUBD2QWqHB9Q KgPTkK5kTpyGiqZjkYcVoNVQgSMEFnjHpCfWU= Received: by 10.151.48.1 with SMTP id a1mr12372686ybk.85.1289936002265; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:33:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.108] (adsl-070-145-128-139.sip.mem.bellsouth.net [70.145.128.139]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k2sm158020ybj.20.2010.11.16.11.33.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:33:20 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:33:19 -0600 Cc: Chad Fulton , "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" , Lars Schultz , PHP internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <4CE28F49.9000700@toolpark.com> To: Ferenc Kovacs X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 - Meta attribute (aka. Annotations) support discussion From: pmjones88@gmail.com (Paul M Jones) On Nov 16, 2010, at 13:27 , Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Chad Fulton = wrote: >=20 >> I understand where you're coming from, and I appreciate the effort >> you've put into this RFC so far, but what I meant is that (although I >> don't have karma and won't be voting), *if* I were to vote, I would >> only +1 annotations if they were extremely limited (key=3D>value = pairs). >>=20 >=20 > if that what you want, you should vote +1 for the annotations, or open = a new > vote for extending the reflection api to allow getting invidual = docblock > tags I am a low man on this totem pole, and have no karma at all, but I have = to say that makes a great deal of sense to me. Right now, for = documenting a codebase, I parse the docblocks in userland to extract = @tags. Adding that capability to the Reflection classes sounds quite = valuable. --=20 Paul M. Jones http://paul-m-jones.com/