Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50248
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=pm1VffeRWd1xMNFRK0d7QaMJHrkbw6o/oB6wTPhtQqFktu29aGne0XkXZMrGjM4g/y
         0b3XEHlXxcL0Z4G2sG8LZyuM4Ytdif/AgqqrYPWwRtCp/G0gt2+0eV9url/9S2rEZreQ
         DaFF9tzSt3q4nevyLmMwXJy6/ESi13vIqJLYs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4CE234F8.6090400@lsces.co.uk>
References: <AANLkTik703Bky+ZtjdzBMY8tr97m34jDSSMyoB9opJKR@mail.gmail.com>
	<887FE7CFF6F8DE4BB3A9535F53AFD06A2C59B588@il-ex2.zend.net>
	<AANLkTi=RrdK==E7YJHhc8r8-QT+2yjsT6C7sof=3tAvw@mail.gmail.com>
	<887FE7CFF6F8DE4BB3A9535F53AFD06A2C59D7A6@il-ex2.zend.net>
	<4CE234F8.6090400@lsces.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:41:20 -0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTinz4G2xVURNmi9zi3zDfT6UZFawfzu9uax-GbU5@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 - Meta attribute (aka. Annotations) support discussion
From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com ("guilhermeblanco@gmail.com")

Hi Lester,

If you READ my first email of this thread, you'll find out I do not
speak about new syntax, etc.

No matter if you say "that can be done through docblock", you're
automatically saying +1 to this thread.

Please re-read the topic and vote. Thanks.


Cheers,

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk> wrote:
> ( Try again Zeev changing the pigging address ;) )
> Zeev Suraski wrote:
>>
>> I hope I won't stir the pot too much, but with all due respect to the vo=
te
>> of at-best a two digit subset of an arbitrary 3000+ subscribers to
>> internals, there's an overwhelming majority amongst the principal develo=
pers
>> of PHP that voiced an opinion against it. =C2=A0While we have no officia=
l rules
>> or structures for voting features into PHP, PHP being a meritocracy, tha=
t
>> should be enough to put this RFC to bed.
>
> I'd second that.
> There have been a number of developments added to PHP5 in the last few ma=
jor
> versions that offer little but irritation to main stream users. phpdoc is
> used extensively for documentation, and it would be nice to see THAT full=
y
> supporting these other tangents rather than simply inventing a new way of
> doing the same thing. Lets please finish what we currently have work rath=
er
> than adding yet another layer of complexity.
>
> --
> Lester Caine - G8HFL
> -----------------------------
> Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=3Dcontact
> L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
> EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
> Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
> Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>



--=20
Guilherme Blanco
Mobile: +55 (16) 9215-8480
MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
S=C3=A3o Paulo - SP/Brazil