Newsgroups: php.doc,php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.doc:969382296 php.internals:50123
Return-Path: <adam@adamharvey.name>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 3281 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2010 11:32:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 8 Nov 2010 11:32:50 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=adam@adamharvey.name; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=adam@adamharvey.name; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain adamharvey.name designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: adam@adamharvey.name
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.42 mail-yw0-f42.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.213.42] ([209.85.213.42:46824] helo=mail-yw0-f42.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id F1/93-62793-6DFD7DC4 for <phpdoc@lists.php.net>; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 06:32:45 -0500
Received: by ywf9 with SMTP id 9so3623851ywf.29
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 03:32:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.75.38 with SMTP id x38mr2472830ana.55.1289215952106; Mon,
 08 Nov 2010 03:32:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: adam@adamharvey.name
Received: by 10.100.128.13 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 03:32:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=_F+-BvU9JUdtsAyPgUBO9ZQpBTC6dK0R4uU6k@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=_F+-BvU9JUdtsAyPgUBO9ZQpBTC6dK0R4uU6k@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:32:08 +0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: u1BJYi4diXVn100x4Yz92y0Ihjc
Message-ID: <AANLkTimt0EMRkrHGLd8ahBS1BA+u85G8Dm1dnzCuXz-y@mail.gmail.com>
To: RQuadling@googlemail.com
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>, PHP Documentation List <phpdoc@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Potential PC conflict.
From: aharvey@php.net (Adam Harvey)

On 8 November 2010 19:00, Richard Quadling <rquadling@gmail.com> wrote:
> [1] vs [2]
>
> Not asking for a change or anything.

I think it's probably OK the way it is: the manual page is
specifically for MongoId, and the capitalisation's quite distinct from
any other meaning there. The URL might be a touch unfortunate, but I
don't think it's worth worrying about, personally.

Adam