Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50086
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        b=Ac73z13da2dd2+DlvUUZsw+rdP1tkuWG5JCTGu2Phem6/sErjneVQh3SJ5g2dvfg5f
         Jx1O6DIEfgFDWXEEoE7emjmfupDZaDZ8yvxSM9L3RRVTZI21ElvQFu0i+pwunxXnNWj1
         PKnbIi+Re+6Bz6CJNcC0XJdPGEZRoPZPNA1FA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <7B411066-1A65-4D28-A0CA-B3A736CCF6A5@zend.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1011011431111.26633@kossu.derickrethans.nl>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1011011534040.26633@kossu.derickrethans.nl>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1011011610480.26633@kossu.derickrethans.nl>
	<4CCFD28B.7070901@lsces.co.uk>
	<AANLkTimGLoZgw4=rY-Tx2RGkh3i5QuxpU_grHCU5yDd8@mail.gmail.com>
	<7B411066-1A65-4D28-A0CA-B3A736CCF6A5@zend.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 20:17:28 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=k1JO-_Dn0i5iSnX=XJzfgS6qSvGvcF-erJanN@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
Cc: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIFLDuG1ja2U=?= <ar@ez.no>, 
	Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163631086d920664049416c610
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4: Adding APC
From: info@tyrael.hu (Ferenc Kovacs)

--00163631086d920664049416c610
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:

> On Nov 2, 2010, at 9:13, "Andr=C3=A9 R=C3=B8mcke" <ar@ez.no> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk> wrote=
:
> >
> >> Derick Rethans wrote:
> >>
> >>> Actually, Kalle just pointed out that it compiles just fine. In that
> >>> case, I think we should put it in trunk and in the 5.4 alpha.
> >>>
> >>
> >> As long as it is disabled by default and can easily be replaced by
> >> preferred alternatives ... eaccelerator is still working fine now that
> it
> >> has been upgraded to handle 5.3 ... although it would be nice to see
> some
> >> more up to date comparisons. Although I suspect in reality, the
> combination
> >> with database and other caching activity means that a straight
> comparison
> >> may be a little meaningless? Change the database and the figures are
> going
> >> to be different anyway ... so a straight comparison on non-database co=
de
> >> would be a little more practical.
> >>
> >
> > +1. Being disabled by default was agreed on for "old 6.x" so should be
> for
> > 5.4 as well.
>
> +1
>
> As long as it actually works as opposed to just compiling :)
>
> Zeev
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
Hi.

I think there were 2 open question when the APC merge was brought to the
list:
- Which branch should be merged? From the past and current emails, I think
we are talking about the current trunk.
- Should APC be enabled by default?

If APC would be disabled by default, and the current trunk works, then I
would +1 for the inclusion.
However I think that the original thread is about the current status, and
the possible problems.

Tyrael

--00163631086d920664049416c610--