Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50084 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33584 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2010 18:14:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Nov 2010 18:14:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.185 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.185 il-mr1.zend.com Received: from [212.25.124.185] ([212.25.124.185:47824] helo=il-mr1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 75/00-33283-F1550DC4 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:14:57 -0500 Received: from il-gw1.zend.com (unknown [10.1.1.22]) by il-mr1.zend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201E250513; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 20:10:09 +0200 (IST) Received: from IL-EX2.zend.net ([::1]) by il-ex2.zend.net ([::1]) with mapi; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 20:14:32 +0200 To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_R=F8mcke?= CC: Lester Caine , PHP internals Thread-Topic: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4: Adding APC Thread-Index: AQHLehUHP+Qe9BMy6UCc/9fGGXgJRZNdHoSAgACj1ICAAHmugIAAQ2eY Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:14:31 +0000 Message-ID: <7B411066-1A65-4D28-A0CA-B3A736CCF6A5@zend.com> References: <4CCFD28B.7070901@lsces.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4: Adding APC From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) On Nov 2, 2010, at 9:13, "Andr=E9 R=F8mcke" wrote: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Lester Caine wrote: >=20 >> Derick Rethans wrote: >>=20 >>> Actually, Kalle just pointed out that it compiles just fine. In that >>> case, I think we should put it in trunk and in the 5.4 alpha. >>>=20 >>=20 >> As long as it is disabled by default and can easily be replaced by >> preferred alternatives ... eaccelerator is still working fine now that i= t >> has been upgraded to handle 5.3 ... although it would be nice to see som= e >> more up to date comparisons. Although I suspect in reality, the combinat= ion >> with database and other caching activity means that a straight compariso= n >> may be a little meaningless? Change the database and the figures are goi= ng >> to be different anyway ... so a straight comparison on non-database code >> would be a little more practical. >>=20 >=20 > +1. Being disabled by default was agreed on for "old 6.x" so should be fo= r > 5.4 as well. +1 As long as it actually works as opposed to just compiling :) Zeev