Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50078 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 34379 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2010 08:59:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Nov 2010 08:59:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 213.123.26.185 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.123.26.185 c2beaomr07.btconnect.com Received: from [213.123.26.185] ([213.123.26.185:53410] helo=mail.btconnect.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 90/00-34304-303DFCC4 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 03:59:50 -0500 Received: from host81-138-11-136.in-addr.btopenworld.com (EHLO _10.0.0.4_) ([81.138.11.136]) by c2beaomr07.btconnect.com with ESMTP id AOI59674; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 08:57:47 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4CCFD28B.7070901@lsces.co.uk> Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 08:57:47 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20101013 SUSE/2.0.9-2.1 SeaMonkey/2.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP internals References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=tid=0001.0A0B0302.4CCFD28B.018F, actions=tag X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2beaomr07.btconnect.com X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0201.4CCFD2FC.00F9,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4: Adding APC From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) Derick Rethans wrote: > Actually, Kalle just pointed out that it compiles just fine. In that > case, I think we should put it in trunk and in the 5.4 alpha. As long as it is disabled by default and can easily be replaced by preferred alternatives ... eaccelerator is still working fine now that it has been upgraded to handle 5.3 ... although it would be nice to see some more up to date comparisons. Although I suspect in reality, the combination with database and other caching activity means that a straight comparison may be a little meaningless? Change the database and the figures are going to be different anyway ... so a straight comparison on non-database code would be a little more practical. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php