Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50073
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=NQxuzjPPSPl792CCi+LgY3TniLN4UB5FKudUEjJ52+RPmnOBo7ZpIOmDLR/XGBwiZc
         WoZT/HtTQ/UBQPX5bKFp1UgzLKvta9H8SvDl/MEliJ3oE+FzsD5+OKDiDEWIac4mGaf7
         v3p+zT2pFKM8Awh38oupHgqrFYuJh0vKEa1/8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1011011533080.26633@kossu.derickrethans.nl>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1011011431111.26633@kossu.derickrethans.nl>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1011011533080.26633@kossu.derickrethans.nl>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 00:40:27 -0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTinB22Lv0xneqvU6NUCwH=pPTK9OeyktX4jaRcRQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>
Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4: Annotations
From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com ("guilhermeblanco@gmail.com")

Hi Derick,

I'm all for it.
Although I have karma, I'm not an active PHP core contributor, but I
would like to participate of such discussion, mainly because I have
plenty experience with Annotations from another languages.

I'll spend some time re-reading the entire Annotations thread and come
up with another proposal at the right time.

Regards,

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The RFC on annotations for PHP http://wiki.php.net/rfc/annotations
> suggests to add new syntax to the language to provide meta data for use
> in reflection. This sort of meta data is usually provided in the form of
> docblocks, which this RFC does *not* state isn't good enough.
>
> The discussion on the mailinglist did not provide a clear consensus for
> either for or against. We could put this up for a vote, but I feel that
> that is not useful right now, because a few issues needs to be sorted
> out first. First, where we actually require annotations (over the
> current practise of using docblocks); and secondly whether we really
> want to introduce another syntax into the PHP scanners and parsers.
>
> For now I would suggest that this proposal needs to be sorted out before
> we can even suggest of putting it in PHP 5.4.
>
> cheers,
> Derick
>
> --
> http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org
> Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php
> twitter: @derickr and @xdebug
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>



--=20
Guilherme Blanco
Mobile: +55 (16) 9215-8480
MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
S=C3=A3o Paulo - SP/Brazil