Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:50007 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41367 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2010 10:50:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Oct 2010 10:50:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=jaenecke@gmx.li; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=jaenecke@gmx.li; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.li designates 213.165.64.22 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: jaenecke@gmx.li X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.165.64.22 mailout-de.gmx.net Received: from [213.165.64.22] ([213.165.64.22:44858] helo=mail.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5B/92-24227-168FBCC4 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 06:50:10 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2010 10:50:06 -0000 Received: from p4FE34C27.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.2.110]) [79.227.76.39] by mail.gmx.net (mp060) with SMTP; 30 Oct 2010 12:50:06 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3998290 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+Fp5lzVcqFA41WYKmdRBr2jNsxNAes6jgwU2sF/l /tgDRtACPDLAeJ Message-ID: <4CCBF85B.4090601@gmx.li> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 12:50:03 +0200 Reply-To: jaenecke@php.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <4CCBB87F.7090209@codeangel.org> <4CCBBB6C.5040802@lerdorf.com> <4CCBBC86.3020005@codeangel.org> In-Reply-To: <4CCBBC86.3020005@codeangel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] rename T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM to T_DOUBLE_COLON From: jaenecke@gmx.li (=?windows-1252?Q?Daniel_J=E4necke?=) On 30.10.2010 08:34, Chad Emrys wrote: > Well Rasmus, I wish you would hang out more in ##php on freenode. (I > see you there every so often) But we do get that question about that > thing a lot. And even some rage, and I have to cool them off with all > the reasons you and Andi are giving me right now. But I am not > convinced nostalgia or "teaching the English speakers a lesson" is a > good reason to keep around a confusing error message. Well, isn't the problem here more people asking on IRC rather than using a search engine before? Renaming will not solve that. ~danielj