Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49995 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 8790 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2010 06:37:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Oct 2010 06:37:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.153 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.153 smtp153.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.153] ([67.192.241.153:43021] helo=smtp153.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6D/62-31541-E0DBBCC4 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 02:37:03 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp25.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 996D32D0123; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 02:36:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp25.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 559342D00BC; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 02:36:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4CCBBD0A.9020600@sugarcrm.com> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:36:58 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chad Emrys CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4CCBB87F.7090209@codeangel.org> In-Reply-To: <4CCBB87F.7090209@codeangel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] rename T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM to T_DOUBLE_COLON From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > I can see only positives by switching it out. can someone give me a > light on how much it would actually cost to do that? Some negatives? I It would probably require bribing all the opponents, so the cost would be in high six digits (in $US) I guess. > what I am trying to point out as a problem, and the reason why we should It's not a problem. A very mild irritation at best. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227