Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49974
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=AzKmz6s4jnGthAIAQK8eH1Y+9Mv2DB7ONzvHjyv+Kf9QlP9MeAVM9g54UjOdTIYNUh
         kz0OOxlWQYYZ6y+b6p4elDrG8Re5ufiJZskbLLOWW/XKV5Lr/6qJVAbxuv7BtOt+z5va
         0Ev4xTpIW2bA3+cIZVzPpzoR+rFc8BWXSKn28=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: RQuadling@googlemail.com
In-Reply-To: <20101026144822.GA8987@panix.com>
References: <20101024223825.GC19835@gerbil.thgnet.it> <4CC4B628.3060304@sugarcrm.com>
 <20101024225628.GB88594@croustillant.local> <20101026144822.GA8987@panix.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:46:23 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTikEJWmjp_Vm=4iK9q6ks-19Tu+m1qawUO7R4Y+n@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Convissor <danielc@analysisandsolutions.com>
Cc: PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] BC break in 5.3.2 -> 5.3.3 with "parent::" and __call/__callStatic
From: rquadling@gmail.com (Richard Quadling)

On 26 October 2010 15:48, Daniel Convissor
<danielc@analysisandsolutions.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:56:28AM +0200, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
>
>> Exactly, if Bar::getFoo is not called statically, parent::getFoo() will
>> not be a static call, it should not get through __callStatic.
>
> That logic sounds good. =C2=A0Unfortunately, things aren't behaving that =
way:
>
> <?php
>
> // Rework of code from http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=3D51176
> class p {
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0public function __call($n, $a) {
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0echo "call\n";
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0}
>
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0public static function __callStatic($n, $a) {
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0echo "callStatic\n=
";
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0}
> }
>
> class c extends p {
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0public function existing() {
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0parent::non_existi=
ng();
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0}
> }
>
> $c =3D new c;
> echo 'static =3D ';
> c::s();
> echo 'object =3D ';
> $c->o();
> echo 'parent =3D ';
> $c->existing();
>
> echo phpversion() . "\n";
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Dan

So the calling context/scope is going to have to be used to determine
if the call should get to __call or __callStatic.

Is that possible? Appropriate? Easy to do? Done by Friday?


--=20
Richard Quadling
Twitter : EE : Zend
@RQuadling : e-e.com/M_248814.html : bit.ly/9O8vFY