Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49952 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 46269 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 10:57:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 10:57:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rquadling@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rquadling@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rquadling@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.42 mail-qw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.42] ([209.85.216.42:51678] helo=mail-qw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 0B/91-38375-48C10CC4 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:57:08 -0400 Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so3404122qwg.29 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 03:57:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k06MyY/le4cDq5M5GhzSmKIClZM1K7CZnYS38LCnIns=; b=kh4yej3A/LOtiP2ankYcB8ms0+pUUZR6AMUioKcJeiwtzB09VhdONCuZ8xZznWwME1 +C58z17ZWElJkBjq/cqjtbzid1qpbr4as9/sCqDGwzjWz64HPn+hcixVIf9nJA3ydLMs ZMf177ZMgPpe3B+4c6jBFuByWVWH7EBaH9/kk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OYLYrlmUoMkcpvCG+lAGguLHXkq7ipl1OQ49TPDZ31m+kAFn+7lq0tmRJ8I6xtrPDq 2HVXOFaaWTpTaeZWhVXeA9WXL5ao9HdEzAMgn081YhVcZQWxiJh6wmT+AeAVqaKznqCO n8FscRex6EfAeLzTBT6ZeyaNamrsc+HLdNFUc= Received: by 10.224.124.79 with SMTP id t15mr608675qar.201.1287658621935; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 03:57:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.20.1 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 03:56:41 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: RQuadling@googlemail.com In-Reply-To: <4CC019B6.9080507@gmail.com> References: <4CBFF13B.5060404@gmail.com> <4CC019B6.9080507@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:56:41 +0100 Message-ID: To: "Ionut G. Stan" Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Skipping of defaulted parameters. From: rquadling@gmail.com (Richard Quadling) On 21 October 2010 11:45, Ionut G. Stan wrote: > On 21/Oct/10 1:17 PM, Richard Quadling wrote: >> >> On 21 October 2010 08:52, Ionut G. Stan =C2=A0wr= ote: >>> >>> Option 5: Implement named parameters? >>> >> >> Come on, play fair. I know all about the named parameters and I didn't >> mention them. > > Where's the unfairness? I proposed them because the issue you raised is a > perfectly valid reason to introduce named parameters. IMO. Because for the last few days, named parameters have been discussed. Again. And with the same result. Not yet (and maybe not ever) for PHP. --=20 Richard Quadling Twitter : EE : Zend @RQuadling : e-e.com/M_248814.html : bit.ly/9O8vFY