Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49799 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 596 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2010 21:29:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Sep 2010 21:29:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=petercowburn@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=petercowburn@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: petercowburn@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.170 mail-iw0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.170] ([209.85.214.170:49795] helo=mail-iw0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D4/B0-29017-62E52AC4 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:29:11 -0400 Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so147963iwn.29 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:29:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=w9+80v7zA3rRPuMSTdXHzGquwdDI5/ujNCAygiUrOFw=; b=DDaq1RgYLbfJ7kAC9lFdlqB3EVOtwo8nnezp+cqgnXHnqBESySNj9z+mH1zCIb1wD3 bUoWrqGZV9rFO/xiU8Aqnq6ViHJrOVoFuDn5pnu2o90iyy4Q/n2sKb8q1hogsR+9csO5 DUzoTW+5qZx9lIqWzNBlHvM0EThYCog5LpyZc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=v29PLbjF9ubwcWFYdxyjs0An6oL1L438WgAlulzbSrI5nl0PJ2hhrcY900YoHkcxm+ ezukRGOMW0LryV8Gnrx2V1pzaB7y7ayg2NgDhIRE9ApfACZThq+NeJt9yv006jCQiHMP zJUGJrYTDK7SlijmNj4cBRVQn+zc49fdjV4Jc= Received: by 10.231.38.9 with SMTP id z9mr627302ibd.24.1285709347726; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:29:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.0.202 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:28:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <9CE5BB6D-2BBC-4171-AF43-01A27EBDE1EF@roshambo.org> <4C9BADDD.3010201@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:28:45 +0100 Message-ID: To: Arvids Godjuks Cc: Mark Skilbeck , internals@lists.php.net, Philip Olson , Andi Gutmans Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: deprecation status of $str{42} versus $str[42], revisited From: petercowburn@gmail.com (Peter Cowburn) On 23 September 2010 21:39, Arvids Godjuks wrote: > I think leave both ways, because it's really much of the code uses actually > {4} rather than [4] for strings. > But please do the substr functionality as it was suggested a few years > before. That makes perfect sense :) > Are there any further thoughts on this thread? Even though {} is a small and likely uninteresting topic, it would be nice to actually (finally, until we change our minds) come to a conclusion and unite the code with the docs.