Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49780 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 72209 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2010 04:48:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Sep 2010 04:48:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=crocodile2u@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=crocodile2u@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.177 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: crocodile2u@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.177 mail-qy0-f177.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.177] ([209.85.216.177:44279] helo=mail-qy0-f177.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 59/D0-63309-12CDA9C4 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:48:34 -0400 Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so1919777qyk.8 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:48:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jHObTcI13fdJomsKz8OKFa+93pcxvH8OWuuPUe4bI+o=; b=I6wr4TTqSa6pCk/aa0kWdZCQ0vuEFve2zaZeHxIsikD0l6pnCQ1fD6FSwnnm3qTfcU JdB+Yy22l7Vfz6NX1FpVc6d1Q0VaJ+7IU9IcNSjBWl7da7qJutpR5GpEoqaOQw87/TDr 5g84RWhRXR65NeoTT8I7q3ihfO49ax3K5dMiM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RkqXYPaXIzl5oRwZzMqNMS8D6FTrxIQJTE5Vy6lKdQHkN8Q/XdkAEduRm9yZZzOc/9 g2rBJ6muvVX44ewCAQG/i4DKYQOARcU3WO0RuHNMfc2f/SsiYDObCpd1vBAwf+DRad3w S/bdhugOjpNq7pEIvoDjY0n8xemWRZBC9w4g0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.36.207 with SMTP id u15mr817816qad.332.1285217311214; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:48:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.98.200 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:48:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <9CE5BB6D-2BBC-4171-AF43-01A27EBDE1EF@roshambo.org> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 08:48:31 +0400 Message-ID: To: PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cb09e4b603c0490e5f99f Subject: Fwd: [PHP-DEV] deprecation status of $str{42} versus $str[42], revisited From: crocodile2u@gmail.com (Victor Bolshov) --0015175cb09e4b603c0490e5f99f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ---------- =F0=C5=D2=C5=D3=CC=C1=CE=CE=CF=C5 =D3=CF=CF=C2=DD=C5=CE=C9=C5 --= -------- =EF=D4 =CB=CF=C7=CF: Victor Bolshov =E4=C1=D4=C1: 23 =D3=C5=CE=D4=D1=C2=D2=D1 2010 =C7. 8:48 =F4=C5=CD=C1: Re: [PHP-DEV] deprecation status of $str{42} versus $str[42], revisited =EB=CF=CD=D5: Chris Stockton Personally, I use the syntax $str{1} since long time before 2006, and when it comes to that, I always remember {} but always forget []. It's just a habit. Definitelty, I would prefer {} syntax to stay and not to issue any kind of error. 2010/9/23 Chris Stockton Hello, > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Philip Olson wrote= : > > Greetings geeks, > > > > Also, Andi mentioned[1] the possibility of optimizing {} for string use > (the original intent) in which case keeping {} would be wise. > > It was over two years ago I commented on my interest in keeping {} and > offering/exploring the potential to performance or feature > improvements to the syntax, I still have the same opinion personally. > > -Chris > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > --=20 =F3 =D5=D7=C1=D6=C5=CE=C9=C5=CD, =F7=C9=CB=D4=CF=D2 --=20 =F3 =D5=D7=C1=D6=C5=CE=C9=C5=CD, =F7=C9=CB=D4=CF=D2 --0015175cb09e4b603c0490e5f99f--