Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49753
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain nebm.ist.utl.pt from 193.136.128.22 cause and error)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <AANLkTinGFY8OobnjxEm6EDZyrqrTtvMJdceFMgAcGb7t@mail.gmail.com>
 <op.vi5cz2n6idpuyk@cataphract-old.dulce.lo.geleia.net>
 <A2.10.03800.CF1639C4@pb1.pair.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:48:15 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: =?utf-8?Q?N=C3=BAcleo_de_Eng=2E_Biom=C3=A9di?=
 =?utf-8?Q?ca_do_IST?=
Message-ID: <op.vi6jaoyqidpuyk@damnation.dulce.lo.geleia.net>
In-Reply-To: <A2.10.03800.CF1639C4@pb1.pair.com>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.62 (Win32)
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] docBlock Parser RFC
From: glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt ("Gustavo Lopes")

On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:41:33 +0100, Matthew Weier O'Phinney  
<weierophinney@php.net> wrote:

> On 2010-09-16, "Gustavo Lopes" <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt> wrote:
>> Pointless.
>>
>> Well, this will maybe speedup and standardize the usage of doc comments,
>> but it's very far from what we could do with real annotations.
>
> Let's argue this one on its own merits, and not on the basis of whether  
> or not it can be used for annotations parsing; that can and should be a  
> separate, later issue.

Fair enough, but it was not I who presented doc comments parsing as if it  
were some sort of valid alternative for annotations, which is how the  
topic came up...

-- 
Gustavo Lopes