Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49752 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 82615 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2010 13:36:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Sep 2010 13:36:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.54 mail-ww0-f54.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.54] ([74.125.82.54:36004] helo=mail-ww0-f54.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 42/A2-03800-2EE639C4 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:36:35 -0400 Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so2334640wwb.11 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:36:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CnvoDaMtA5HmKxM/OqIPSaO7OWqGtm52LlsTk3onlgE=; b=THFMP75gRQROK7p8C9wb01kFe0UNRcWoikZXDVXSfmVsHDVzK0rVaXkz3ZuV+CoqHC OB4uNudcBj69pxVO4iwwYGHSyaqrWeCPkW2/GA+mWgL31xn7PAHmozM5e0haVnR6OCjQ ZQa/NieOKNo5AUik7OHzHWgXIRX/mBUMtZ52o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=K/KU0IeWC7F/Gc2c7V0icqEcZpLyfXT620ryaa6QGdT1vFZ1Z/bFoushrPO/80QDpz n2AWGZ+Irzm1pvzwnIarea7/3g8rx48BatEVi8e37OmAxff1VZN9kulSa1XYVVWum0Gy LKCcwWNnpEm8/w3xBRdTtVzrLzN6z6G/Tp2Dg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.138.141 with SMTP id a13mr4091271wbu.208.1284730591743; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:36:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.131.72 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:36:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <64.90.15036.933829C4@pb1.pair.com> References: <4C887D2B.2000605@zend.com> <4C8AC526.7000505@sugarcrm.com> <4C8B6168.30504@mohiva.com> <4C8BC81E.8000605@sugarcrm.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20100913145703.0d226d90@zend.com> <4C926574.8030805@sugarcrm.com> <4C926E03.1030109@sugarcrm.com> <4C92790C.4070405@sugarcrm.com> <64.90.15036.933829C4@pb1.pair.com> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:36:31 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Matthew Weier O'Phinney" Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP Annotations RFC + Patch From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi, On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > (I'm still not entirely convinced that the same goals could not be achieved via > code written on top of a docblock parser extension.) Look at the xdoclet fiasco, that should finish to convince you that phpdoc has nothing to do with annotations. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org