Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49732 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 60102 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2010 20:42:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Sep 2010 20:42:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=guilhermeblanco@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=guilhermeblanco@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.170 mail-wy0-f170.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.170] ([74.125.82.170:57158] helo=mail-wy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id AC/5F-15036-6AA729C4 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:14:31 -0400 Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so1782760wyf.29 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:14:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=z9n6ex4dhZRXB7ifS6d6t+sv8NoGtdWp4SiWNOzgvpE=; b=xQsEb7GnKjuoWyHDplcJfiONyqwOvKFSsdLbZ9fme8LXVMkIVzWe72yzorujtOPzRY ZYWG7FSkSRAtd34WKgPqzt5JwavZQd93TmfDP9P+b/godGuzGLZaQNnzbC/Jh5WokFHv v9oMx6P8RIia8erKacrwA4CCBiz0LwSAdEHzg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=twHO1+hAWvteT0aho84T5kjqLJjk6wbi39iZNxiWWi1odRdYEVEE4++ljIGrb4xihJ 2LIHl0F3Y6ltR8tO+xyBnr5RT3KhGF/KQvDUCZBQlTfcaj+tCrAS2/CZsBX/aWiml0EY 58BBYnsSu4rk9SZq2VkI8SgGLEBl+Y6agD7mY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.174.69 with SMTP id w47mr3277438wel.25.1284668067590; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.55.130 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:14:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C92790C.4070405@sugarcrm.com> References: <4C873C0F.1010200@zend.com> <4C879613.7090709@zend.com> <4C887D2B.2000605@zend.com> <4C8AC526.7000505@sugarcrm.com> <4C8B6168.30504@mohiva.com> <4C8BC81E.8000605@sugarcrm.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20100913145703.0d226d90@zend.com> <4C926574.8030805@sugarcrm.com> <4C926E03.1030109@sugarcrm.com> <4C92790C.4070405@sugarcrm.com> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:14:27 -0300 Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP Annotations RFC + Patch From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com (Guilherme Blanco) Ol=C3=A1! On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Stas Malyshev wro= te: > Hi! > >> Again, you change the meanings of something I write. >> I do not want Java Annotations on PHP. But I want a clean way to >> include metadata mapping on my class/property/method/function. > > Everybody wants a clean way to include metadata. It's *what* this way is > where the difference is. So is the vote about having any metadata retriev= al > mechanism? Specific proposal exactly as proposed? Some generalization of = the > proposal without specifying some details? The RFC contains all details of proposal. If the syntax is not ok, then let's discuss the implementation once it gets accepts or forget about it if not. But overall functionality is described there. > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ > (408)454-6900 ext. 227 > --=20 Guilherme Blanco Mobile: +55 (16) 9215-8480 MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com S=C3=A3o Paulo - SP/Brazil