Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49730 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 54838 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2010 20:07:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Sep 2010 20:07:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.193 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.193 smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.193] ([67.192.241.193:59349] helo=smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EF/BE-15036-019729C4 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:07:45 -0400 Received: from relay9.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay9.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id AA6BF13D3809; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:07:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: by relay9.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 5925513D38D6; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:07:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C92790C.4070405@sugarcrm.com> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:07:40 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100825 Thunderbird/3.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guilherme Blanco CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4C873C0F.1010200@zend.com> <4C879613.7090709@zend.com> <4C887D2B.2000605@zend.com> <4C8AC526.7000505@sugarcrm.com> <4C8B6168.30504@mohiva.com> <4C8BC81E.8000605@sugarcrm.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20100913145703.0d226d90@zend.com> <4C926574.8030805@sugarcrm.com> <4C926E03.1030109@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP Annotations RFC + Patch From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > Again, you change the meanings of something I write. > I do not want Java Annotations on PHP. But I want a clean way to > include metadata mapping on my class/property/method/function. Everybody wants a clean way to include metadata. It's *what* this way is where the difference is. So is the vote about having any metadata retrieval mechanism? Specific proposal exactly as proposed? Some generalization of the proposal without specifying some details? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227